ABSTRACT
Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract characterized by immune dysregulation and decreased T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire diversity. Patients with immune-mediated disorders such as IBD have attenuated convalescent antibody responses after COVID-19 infection. We sought to understand the immune configuration associated with high versus low convalescent SARS-CoV- 2 antibodies in patients with IBD using single-cell immunophenotyping. Methods: We performed a study of 9 patients with IBD who were SARS-CoV-2 convalescent (recovered from COVID-19 and converted RNA positive to negative) and 9 matched SARS-CoV-2 naïve controls (no prior COVID-19, confirmed RNA negative). We measured plasma SARS-CoV- 2 antibody (N protein IgG, S1RBD IgG, S1RBD IgA) levels from patients with IBD two months after recovering from COVID-19 (RNA negative). We selected three patients with the highest SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and three matched (for age, sex, IBD subtype and disease activity, medications, COVID-19 severity) patients with the lowest antibodies and performed their peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) single-cell transcriptomics with paired TCR and BCR sequencing using 10X Genomics. Normalization, dimensionality reduction, and clustering were performed using Seurat. TCR and BCR immune repertoire analyses were performed using Immunarch. Results: SARS-CoV-2 convalescent patients with IBD had detectable but variable SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels (range 0-469 U/mL), whereas SARSCoV- 2 naïve IBD patients had no detectable antibodies. The mean SARS-CoV-2 antibody concentration among the three IBD patients with the highest and three patients with the lowest groups differed by more than 10-fold (206.0 vs 17.5 U/mL, P<0.001). PBMC singlecell immunophenotyping revealed decreased naïve CD4+ T cell and increased CD14+ monocyte and memory CD4+ T cell proportions in IBD patients in the low versus high SARSCoV- 2 antibody group. There were higher numbers of HLA-DQA1+ B cells and CD8 T cells and lower GPR183+ B cells and CD8 T cells in the high SARS-CoV-2 antibody group. There was a trend towards decreased TCR and BCR repertoire diversity in the low SARS-COV-2 antibody group. Finally, we identified immunoglobulin gene signatures (IGHV1-69D/IGLV3- 25, IGHV3-48, IGHV3-7/IGKV41/IGLV1-47, IGHV3-7/IGKV4-1, IGHV3-7/IGKV4-44) that were enriched only in the high SARS-CoV-2 antibody group. Conclusions: Single-cell immunophenotyping of PBMC from convalescent patients with IBD reveal differences in CD4+ T cell, CD14+ monocyte, and HLA-DQA1+ and GPR183+ B and CD8 T cell immunophenotypes, immune repertoire diversity, and immunoglobulin gene signatures in patients with high versus low SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels.(Figure Presented)Figure 1. SARS-COV-2 Antibodies in Convalescent Patients with IBD and Single-Cell Immunophenotypes. A) SARS-COV-2 antibody levels in COVID-19 convalescent versus SARS-CoV-2 naïve patients with IBD B) T-SNE plot of PBMC immunophenotypes in all convalescent patients with IBD C) Differences in proportion of single-cell PBMC immunophenotypes in high versus low SARS-COV-2 antibody patients D) Differences in HLA-DQA1 and GPR183 immunophenotypes in high versus low SARS-COV-2 antibody patients.
ABSTRACT
We recently investigated incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 outcomes in MGUS patients during the early waves of pandemic, when vaccines were still not available (Sgherza N. et al Haematologica. 2022). In that study, we found that these subjects neither have an increased risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2, nor show poorer COVID-19 outcomes with respect to controls. Aiming to specifically address the clinical effects of vaccines, we compared incidence and outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection of 1,454 previously described, not vaccinated MGUS patients (91 of whom were SARS-CoV-2 positive), with those observed in a similar population during the national vaccination campaign. So far, we have obtained retrospective information from 41 individuals found to be SARS-CoV-2 positive among 763 MGUS patients analyzed after at least two doses of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine received between April 2021, and January, 2022. The mean age of this group was 64.1 +/-14.1 years (range 31-90);16 patients were female (39%), and 25 were male (61%). About MGUS-subtypes, the most frequent one was IgG-lambda (n=20;48.8%), followed by IgG-kappa (n=14;34.1%), IgA-kappa (n=3;7.3%), IgA-lambda (n=2;4.9%) and IgM-kappa (n=2;4.9%). Most of patients (39/41, 95%) were at low or low-intermediate risk, according to Mayo Clinic prognostic model. Twenty-one (51.2%) patients developed SARS-CoV-2 infection after two doses (5, 15 and 1 patients receiving ChAdOx1-S, BNT162b2 mRNA and mRNA-1273 vaccines, respectively), twenty (48.8%) after three doses (BNT162b2 mRNA or mRNA-1273 as 'booster' dose, repectively). The mean number of days between last dose of vaccine and SARS-CoV-2 infection was 98.8 +/-77.8 (range 2-240). The two populations of SARS-CoV2 positive MGUS patients (before and after vaccination) were comparable for age, sex and presence of co-morbidities (data not shown). Overall, rates of symptoms (59.3% vs 31.8%), hospitalization (20.9% vs 0%), and hospitalization in Intensive Care Unit (11% vs 0%) were significantly higher in still not vaccinated MGUS patients than in those who had received vaccines (Table 1). A strong trend toward a higher rate of deaths (8,8% vs 0%) was also observed in not vaccinated patients, although it did not reach statistical significance, probably due to the small number of evaluated patients. Interestingly, incidence of SARS-CoV-2 detection in vaccinated patients was not significally different from that of patients analyzed before vaccination (5.4% vs 6.2%, respectively) (p=0.402). Our data indicate that the possibility to be infected by SARS-CoV-2 is probably not significantly reduced by vaccination (even after three doses), likely also because of the higher diffusion capacity of the recently recognized Omicron viral variants. However, as observed in normal population and in other hematological contexts, the clinical outcome of COVID- 19 may be significantly improved after vaccination in MGUS patients, with less of one third of patients who were symptomatic and no case of hospitalization or death in our series. These observation reinforces the need to proceed with an active vaccination program in these patients. .
ABSTRACT
Introduction. Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (MGUS) is a pre-malignant plasma cell disorder reported in approximately 3% of individuals aged > 50 years, characterized by a low risk (about 1% per year) of evolution into “overt” myeloma or other lymphoproliferative diseases. It is classified as IgM-MGUS (15%) and non-IgM-MGUS (80-85%). MGUS is usually asymptomatic, but a higher risk of deep venous thrombosis and infection has been reported. In March 2020, “Coronavirus Disease 2019” (COVID-19) outbreak has been declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. Regarding outcome of COVID-19 in patients with plasma cell dyscrasia, many papers have been published about multiple myeloma (MM), reporting a higher fatality rate respect to general population, while few data are available about the outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with MGUS. Methods. We collected clinical data on MGUS Apulian patients with SARS- CoV-2 infection, tested by RT-PCR on nasopharyngeal swabs between March 1st, 2020 and April 30st, 2021. Among 1454 MGUS patients followed at our center, 91 were found SARS-CoV-2 positive, enrolled in this observational, retrospective study and compared with 182 age and sex-matched normal controls. Clinical data collected regarded: symptoms, hospitalization, hospitalization in intensive care unit, death. Calculations were carried out using Stata MP17. Results. Mean age of whole group (n. 273) was 65,3+/-13,3 years (range: 29-89), with no statistically-significant differences (p=0,734) observed between MGUS-group (65,6+/-13,3;range: 29-89 years) and controls-group (65,2+/- 13,4;range: 29-89 years). Mean number of comorbidities in the whole group was 1,2+/-1,2 (range: 0-5) and no statistically-significant differences (p=0,844) were found between MGUS-group (1,3+/-1,3;range: 0-5) and control group (1,2+/- 0,9;range: 0-3). About MGUS-subtypes, the most frequent was IgG-kappa (n=36;39,6%), followed by IgG-lambda (n=27;29,7%) and IgM-kappa (n=6;6,6%). Regarding MGUS risk-stratification, application of Mayo Clinic model identified 22 patients (24,2%) with low risk, 22 (24,2%) with low-intermediate risk, and 3 (3,3%) with high-intermediate risk;in 44 patients (48,3%) this data was missing. Immunoparesis was present in 13 cases (14,3%) and absent in 55 (60,4%), missing in 23 (25,3%). No patient developed MM or a lymphoproliferative disease progression during and immediately after COVID-19. Rates of symptoms (59,3% vs 56%), hospitalization (20,9% vs 14,3%), hospitalization in intensive care unit (11% vs 8,8%) and death (8,8% vs 5,5%) were slightly higher in MGUS group than controls (Table 1), but these differences were not statistically significant. A statistically significant association (p<0,05), was observed between higher age and death in both groups. Lastly, incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in MGUS patients (6,2%) was not statistically significant different from that observed in the population of the Puglia region (5,8%) in the same period. Conclusions. To our knowledge, this report is the largest study of patients with MGUS and SARS-CoV-2 infection to date. In our study patients with MGUS did not show an increased incidence of this infection compared to the general population and did not appear to represent a risk factor for poor outcome in COVID-19. [Formula presented] Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Pomalidomide is a third-generation immunomodulatory drug approved for relapsed and/or refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM). In the phase 3 OPTIMISMM trial, pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone demonstrated superior efficacy in patients with RRMM. PRIME study (CTRI/2019/10/021618) is testing this combination in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Aim: To determine safety of Pomalidomide in combination with Bortezomib and dexamethasone (VPD) in NDMM Study design: A prospective, single arm, phase II study from a tertiary center. Both transplant eligible and ineligible patients with NDMM aged between 18-70 years are being recruited in the study. Patients with Plasma cell leukemia, POEMS and amyloidosis were excluded. The regimen consists of weekly Bortezomib 1.3mg/sq.m (subcutaneous), Tab. Pomalidomide 2-4mg once daily for 21days, and Tab Dexamethasone 20mg twice weekly, with the cycle repeating every 28 days, 9-12 cycles. Here we report the adverse events (AE) by NCI CTCAE v5.0, upon recruiting 26 patients, as predetermined in the study. Results: Of the proposed 45-50 patients, 26 patients were enrolled in the study between April 2020 to May 2021 and 23 (88.4%) have completed 4 cycles of VPD. The median age is 55years (18-70), and gender ratio 1:1. At disease presentation, bone lesions were the commonest (96.2%, n=25), IMWG high risk cytogenetics were seen in 42.4% (n=11), RISS-2 in 69.3% (n=18), IgG kappa paraproteinemia in 54% (n=14) patients and ECOG performance score 2-3 in 57.6%(n=15). Ten (38.5%) patients have completed 9 cycles, and 3 underwent auto-transplant (between Cycle 4 & 6). Protocol adherence was 96.1% (25/26 patients). Table-1 shows drug-induced toxicity, hematological toxicities were the commonest. Two patients withdrew consent in view of bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy. Serious adverse events (SAE) were reported in 9 (34.6%) patients and were considered unrelated to the regimen by the safety committee (PSVT=1, Bony pain=2, dyspnea=1, pneumonia=1, constipation=1, diarrhea=1, hypotension=1) and one death due to SARS-CoV2 pneumonia. Treatment delays of 2 weeks in 4 patients (SARS-CoV2 = 3, Syncope = 1) After 4 cycles (n=23), 6 (26%) patients were in stringent Complete Response (sCR), 17(74%) in Very Good partial response (VGPR) and 13 (56.5%) are Measurable Residual Disease (MRD) negative. Of 10 patients who completed cycle 9, 9 were MRD negative and 1 showed disease progression. Conclusion: Safety data from the PRIME study demonstrates that VPD regimen has a favorable tolerance profile in patients with NDMM. Early efficacy signals are encouraging, and recruitment continues. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Radhakrishnan: Dr Reddy's Laboratories: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Emcure Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding;Intas Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding;Janssen India: Honoraria;NATCO Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding;Novartis India: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Roche India: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;AstraZeneca India: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;Bristol-Myers-Squibb India: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Cipla Pharmaceuticals India: Research Funding;Aurigene: Speakers Bureau. Garg: Dr Reddys Laboratories: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Nair: Dr Reddy's Laboratories: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Intas pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;Mylan pharmaceuticals: Honoraria;Novartis India: Honoraria;Fresenius Kabi India: Honoraria;Cipla Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;Janssen India: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Chandy: Janssen: Honoraria;Pfizer: Honoraria;Intas Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.